Skripsi
SINKRONISASI PENGATURAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN KEHUTANAN DI DAERAH (Studi Penerapan Pasal 14 Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah Juncto Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 1999 tentang Kehutanan)
This study discussesthe synchronization of the authority of the Central Government and Local Government for the implementation of forestry in the local/region (Study of the Application of Article 14 of Law Number 23 of 2014 on Local Government (Local Government Law) in conjuction with Article 66 of Law Number 41 of 1999 on Forestry (Forestry Law). This study is normative, using a statute approach, conceptual, historical, legal philosophy, and comparison approach. Research material collection techniques was conducted through literature study and information, qualitatively analyzed by deductive and inductive conclusion inference techniques. The result of this study is the regulation of the authority of the Local Government for implementation of forestry in the local area has differences in regulations or just the dualism of norms because the provisions of Article 66 (1) on Forestry Law states that the Central Government surrenders a portion of authority to the Local Government over the implementation of forestry in the framework of developing regional autonomy, while the provisions of Article 14 (1) and (2) on Local Government Law states that the authority for the implementation of forestry becomes the authority of the Central Government and Provincial Government, while the Regency/City Government (Local Government) is only authorized to manage the Grand Forest Park. The impact of these differences is: on the institutional structure, the Governor, Regent/Mayor must coordinate with the Regional Representatives Council and related ministries/institutions in charge of concurrent government on the forestry sector, and report its implementation to the Minister of the Interior; to the relationship between the Regency /Local Government and the Provincial Government, if they are not careful and do not pay attention to the principles of justice and equity in the management and utilization of forestry resources which are territorially in the district / city in general, not the province, then there is the potential for excessive regional sentiment and conflict of interest to arise; and regard to laws and regulations, there is a basic dilemma of laws and regulations which becomes the reference of which government is authorized for the implementation of forestry in the regions, which ones are specialists and which are generalists. Synchronization is carried out in two ways, the firstis, vertical synchronization through a request for judicial review of Article 14 on Local Government Law against Article 18 (2) of the 1945 Constitution. The secondis, horizontal synchronization between the provisions of Article 14 (1) and Article 15 (2) on Local Government Law, through the establishment of implementing regulations, e.g. in the form of Government Regulations on the delegation of the Central Government (President) to Regency/City Government (Local Government) (Regents/Mayors) related to the distribution of authoritarian and operational forestry with the principle of deconcentration and co-administration.
Inventory Code | Barcode | Call Number | Location | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
2007001784 | T34562 | T345622020 | Central Library (REFERENCES) | Available but not for loan - Not for Loan |
No other version available