Skripsi
KETIMPANGAN RELASI ANTARA AGENSI PBB DAN ORGANISASI MASYARAKAT SIPIL DALAM PEMBERIAN BANTUAN (STUDI KASUS: EKSPLOITASI PEREMPUAN PADA KONFLIK SURIAH TAHUN 2015-2024)
This study examines the power imbalance between United Nations (UN) agencies and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in the context of humanitarian aid delivery in Syria, specifically focusing on cases of sexual exploitation of women from 2015 to 2024. While UN agencies such as UNHCR, WFP, UNFPA, and others are mandated to provide humanitarian assistance, field implementation has revealed instances where actors misused their authority by exchanging aid for sexual favors. The research adopts the Advocacy Effectiveness framework by Hans Peter Schmitz, George E. Mitchell, and Tosca Bruno-van Vijfeijken, focusing on four key dimensions: issue characteristics, policy environment, internal capacity, and target characteristics. The findings show that the dominance of international agencies restricts the capacity of local CSOs to investigate, advocate, or directly intervene in such cases. This imbalance is exacerbated by limited access, insufficient funding, and exclusion from strategic decision-making, ultimately weakening protection systems for female victims. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method based on literature review and secondary data. It concludes that structural inequality between international and local actors within the humanitarian aid architecture not only undermines advocacy effectiveness but also deepens the vulnerability of affected groups. Reform is needed in the international aid system to ensure it becomes more inclusive, accountable, and responsive to the perspectives and needs of local CSOs.
Inventory Code | Barcode | Call Number | Location | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
2507005902 | T184460 | T1844602025 | Central Library (Reference) | Available but not for loan - Not for Loan |
Title | Edition | Language |
---|---|---|
INTERNATIONAL CNFLICTS AT WORK: KONFLIK INTERNASIONAL DI TEMPAT KERJA | id |