Skripsi
PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA HAK DI ATAS TANAH FASILITAS UMUM (STUDI PUTUSAN 20/Pdt.G/2013/PN.SBG)
Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal considerations of the judge in the settlement of rights over public facility land based on the decision of the Sibolga District Court No. 20/Pdt.G/2013/PN.SBG. and analyze the legal consequences arising from the judge's decision. This research method uses normative juridical legal research and uses a regulatory approach and a contextual approach. The results of this study explain that the land ownership certificate number 65 of 1987 belonging to the Plaintiff received a reduction in the land area from 280 m² to 266 m². The second Respondent who reduced the land area belonging to the Plaintiff argued that according to applicable regulations it is not allowed to own land and/or build buildings near the riverbank/river embankment. Then without the consent of the plaintiff, the first Respondent has built a building and fenced the land that should belong to the plaintiff. The judge's consideration in this case is that first respondent and second respondent in the definition have denied the plaintiff's lawsuit such as a vague lawsuit on the grounds that the plaintiff did not mention in detail the size of the land being sued, but according to the panel of judges in his lawsuit the plaintiff had explained in detail the size of the land being sued. The judge granted part of the plaintiff's lawsuit and sentenced first and second respondents to pay the costs incurred in the case and hand over the disputed land.
Inventory Code | Barcode | Call Number | Location | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
2507005263 | T182039 | T1820392025 | Central Library (References) | Available but not for loan - Not for Loan |
No other version available