Image of PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENOLAK PERMOHONAN STATUS JUSTICE COLLABORATOR KONTRAKTOR DINAS PUPR MUSI BANYUASIN PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Putusan Nomor : 65/Pid. Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Plg)

Skripsi

PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENOLAK PERMOHONAN STATUS JUSTICE COLLABORATOR KONTRAKTOR DINAS PUPR MUSI BANYUASIN PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Putusan Nomor : 65/Pid. Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Plg)

Penilaian

0,0

dari 5
Penilaian anda saat ini :  

This thesis is entitled "Consideration of Judges Rejecting the Application for Justice Status Collaborator Status of the Contractor of the Musi Banyuasin PUPR Office in the Crime of Corruption (Study of Decision Number: 65/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Plg). Corruption (Study of Decision Number: 65/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Plg)." As for the background of writing this thesis The background of writing this thesis is because the case of corruption which is an extra ordinary crime or extraordinary crime. is an extra ordinary crime or extraordinary crime. Law enforcement officials law enforcement officers have experienced various difficulties in uncovering these criminal acts, various efforts have been made, one of which is the presence of corruption. efforts made, one of which is the presence of a cooperating perpetrator witness or Justice Collaborator. or Justice Collaborator. However, in the protection and application for the status of Justice Collaborators often get rejected by the Panel of Judges. The problem that raised in this paper is how the protection of Justice Collaborator in corruption crimes and how the judge's consideration in rejecting the status of Justice Collaborator in corruption crimes. in rejecting the status of Justice Collaborator in the Crime of Corruption in Decision No. 65/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.2. Decision Number 65/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.Plg. The research method used is the type of normative legal research. The results of the research show that there are several regulations governing the protection of Justice Collaborator and the requirements to become a Justice Collaborator in corruption crimes, namely in SEMA Number 4 of 2011. corruption crime, namely in SEMA Number 4 of 2011 which must be fulfilled in its entirety by the perpetrator. as a whole by the perpetrator of the crime. Denial of Justice Collaborator status status by the Panel of Judges against the defendant Suhandy was appropriate because the defendant did not fulfill one of the provisions contained in SEMA Number 4 2011. fulfill one of the provisions contained in SEMA Number 4 of 2011. Keywords: Judges' Legal Considerations, Justice Collaborator, Corruption Crime Corruption.

Availability
Inventory Code Barcode Call Number Location Status
2407002031T142354T1423542024Central Library (References)Available but not for loan - Not for Loan
Detail Information
Series Title
-
Call Number
T1423542024
Publisher
Indralaya : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya.,
Collation
xv, 77 hlm.; ilus.; 29 cm
Language
Indonesia
ISBN/ISSN
-
Classification
340.07
Content Type
Text
Media Type
unmediated
Carrier Type
-
Edition
-
Subject(s)
Prodi Ilmu Hukum
Specific Detail Info
-
Statement of Responsibility
Other version/related

No other version available

File Attachment
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment