Skripsi
KAJIAN FAKTOR KESUKSESAN PEMBIAYAAN KERJA SAMA PEMERINTAH DAN BADAN USAHA (KPBU) PADA PROYEK KERETA KERTALAYA
The Kertalaya train transports passengers from Palembang to Indralaya. This train has stopped operating since 2019 because it does not receive maintenance from the government. A study that discusses the management of the Kertalaya Train in the future is essential. Based on the survey results, as many as 81.1% of respondents stated that they were interested in using the Kertalaya Train, citing it as cheaper, more comfortable, and safer. Some other wishes are a timely departure schedule, adequate facilities and infrastructure, and free feeder transportation. To fulfil prospective passengers' wishes, a strategy must be made that regulates the Kertalaya Train policy. Based on the SWOT analysis, the policy strategy that must be carried out to make creative financing policies is Government and Business Entity Cooperation (PPP). There are 3 scenarios created, namely the VGF scenario, the operation and maintenance (OM) scenario, and the Aviability Payment (AP) scenario. In the VGF scenario, in addition to getting 49% grant assistance, Business Entities are assisted in financing rail maintenance and ticket price subsidies of Rp. 20,000 per passenger. The VGF scenario is made with 3 simulations. Scenario 1 without reducing rail maintenance costs, scenario 2 with reduced rail maintenance costs, and scenario 3 VGF plus rail cost reduction and ticket subsidy assistance. Based on the calculation results, the NPV value for the VGF scenario is (-) 157 Billion for simulation 1, (-) 107 Billion for simulation 2, and (-) 77 Billion for simulation 3. The OM scenario was made with 3 simulations, namely simulation 1 without reducing rail maintenance costs, simulation 2 with a reduction in rail maintenance costs, and simulation 3 was carried out with a 50% reduction in rail costs. Based on the calculation results, it was found that the NPV value for the OM scenario was (-) 34 billion for simulation 1, (+) 6 billion for simulation 2, and (-) 14 billion for simulation 3. Based on the above, it is found that the least risk for Business Entities is with the AP scheme. PPP agreements through the AP scheme can be carried out by Business Entities and the Government at the beginning so that Business Entities can regulate their financial positions. To support the success of PPP, it is necessary to know the factors that support the success of PPP in the field of Pioneer Trains. There are 6 hypotheses established in this study. The accepted hypothesis is that the standard p-value < 0.05 and t-value > 1.645. Based on the results of the analysis, the following results were obtained: The Business Entity Factor has an influence on financial factors with a p-value = 0.03 and a t-value = 1.834. Government factors do not influence financial factors, with p-value = 0.08 and t-value = 1.358. Stakeholder factors influence financial factors, with p-value = 0.01 and t-value = 2.997. Financial factors influence the success of PPP with a p-value = 0.000 and a t-value = 3.647. Government factors affect the success of PPP with a p-value = 0.000 and a t-value = 3.947. Stakeholder factors affect success with p-value = 0.006 and t-value = 2.489. From the analysis, it was concluded that the factors that affect the success of PPP are government factors, stakeholder factors, and business entity factors. These three factors must synergize so that PPP can succeed in the railway sector. Kata kunci: Kereta Kertalaya, PPP, Success Factors, NPV, SWOT Analysis
Inventory Code | Barcode | Call Number | Location | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
2507000370 | T165367 | T1653672024 | Central Library (Reference) | Available but not for loan - Not for Loan |
No other version available