Skripsi
ANALISIS ALAT BUKTI PADA PUTUSAN HAKIM KASUS PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA YANG DILAKUKAN BERSAMA-SAMA (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 1358/PID.B/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst dan Nomor 490/Pid.B/2017/PN.Jkt.Tim).
This thesis is entitled "Analysis of Evidence in the Judge's Decision on the Case of Premeditated Murder that was Done Together (Study of District Court Decisions Number 1358 /PID.B /2014 /PN.JKT.PST and Number 490 /Pid.B /2017 /PN.Jkt.Tim)". The focus of the problem in this study is how the position of the Visum et Repertum evidence in the trial supports the role of the accused in committing premeditated murder which was carried out together, whether the application of criminal sanctions to the District Court decision No. 1358/PID.B/2014/PN.Jkt. Pst and Number 490/Pid.B/2017/PN.Jkt.Tim are in accordance with the legal facts at trial, as well as how to renew the provisions regarding evidence in criminal procedural law in the future. This research method is normative juridical. The results of the study saw that the Visum et Repertum evidence became the main support in the legal facts at trial proving that the defendant fulfilled all the elements in the primary indictment. According to the author, the urgency of the means of evidence regulated in Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code will be fulfilled in the article on evidence in the draft Law on Criminal Procedure, considering that changes or developments in society, science and technology can also result in the development of criminal acts. Reflecting on the two decisions above, evidence such as electronic evidence and the judge's observation can be key in proving the facts at trial, considering that the two pieces of evidence have been discussed in the decision but are only limited to non-juridical aspects.
Inventory Code | Barcode | Call Number | Location | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
2307003173 | T107054 | T1070542023 | Central Library (Referens) | Available |
No other version available