Electronic Resource

Discussing Cognitive Neuroscience

---

Penilaian

---

The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and – if possible – considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet’s classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight.

---

Availability

Inventory Code	Barcode	Call Number	Location	Status
2108000039	EB0003717	612.823 3 Ben d	Central Library (OPAC)	Available

Detail Information

Series Title

Annals of Theoretical Psychology

Call Number

612.823 3 Ben d

Publisher

Switzerland : Springer Cham., 2021

Collation

vii, 171p.:Ill

Language

English

ISBN/ISSN

978-3-030-71040-8

Classification

612.823 3

Content Type

Ebook

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

online resource

Edition

1

Subject(s)

Cognitive Neuroscience

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

BRF

Other version/related

File Attachment

Comments

---

You must be logged in to post a comment