Text
DISPARITAS PUTUSAN HAKIM PADA TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 12/PID/2015/PT.BGL DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 20/PID.B/2013/PN.MRK.)
Thesis Writing with the Title "Disparity in Judges' Decisions in Criminal Acts" Rape (Judgment Number 20/Pid.B/2013/Pn.Mrk And Decision Number 12/Pid./2015/ Pt.Bgl)”. The formulation of the problem in writing this thesis are: What is the basis for imposing a sentence on the crime of rape on Judge's Decision Number 12/Pid/2015/PT.Bgl and Decision Number 20/Pid.B/2013/PN.Mrk and How to Apply the Theory of Sentence to Judges' Decisions Number 12/Pid./2015/PT.Bgl and Decision Number 20/PID.B/2013/PN.Mrk This research was conducted by analyzing the Court's Decision against the perpetrators Moral Crimes, this research is a normative research. Method the approach used is the Legislative Approach, the Conceptual, And Sociological Approach. Criminal Disparity is a difference which is conspicuous in the Criminal Imposition by the Judge against the Actors Same punishment but different punishment. Criminal disparity occurred in the Crime of Rape as regulated in Article 285 of the Criminal Code in Decision Number 20/Pid.B/2013/Pn.Mrk And Decision Number 12/Pid./2015/Pt.Bgl Perpetrators of the Crime of Rape in the Criminal Code for 5 years and 9 years and at The two Judges' Decisions apply the Combined Criminal Theory.
Inventory Code | Barcode | Call Number | Location | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
2207002627 | T75566 | T755662022 | Central Library (Referens) | Available but not for loan - Not for Loan |
No other version available