Skripsi
AKIBAT HUKUM LABELISASI KELOMPOK BERSENJATA ORGANISASI PAPUA MERDEKA MENURUT HUKUM NASIONAL INDONESIA DAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL
The settlement of Free Papua Movement’s (OPM) Armed Group still is regarded to be an issue in Indonesia. Several parties have been wishing that the OPM be classified into a group of terrorists, while the others want the OPM to be regarded as a separatist or rebellious group. On April 2021, government has officially designated OPM as a terrorist organization. The aim of this research was to find out and to explain the definition, the criteria, and the status of a rebel, and the legal consequence of labeling towards OPM’s Armed Group according to Indonesian National Law and International Law. The method used in this research was Normative Legal Research. Based on our research results, it can be concluded that OPM meets the requirements of a rebel, but it cannot be said as an International Legal Subject yet. Such labeling towards OPM’s Armed Group brings consequences to the qualification of crimes committed and the model of law enforcements against OPM. It is expected that, while overcoming this OPM issue, the government shall be more focused on particular approaches such as well-being development, policies regarding economy, fiscal, and social-culture, and establishment in all the living aspects of Papuan people. The government will need to secure a law enforcement that is equal, provide the people with the right to express their customary rights, provide a maximum protection to the Human Rights, both for the Indonesian Government and the Papuan people, and hold a discussion (between both parties) that hopefully might solve the OPM issue with some measures that are comprehensive and cross-sector in nature, and no longer prioritizing a forceful and militaristic approach.
Inventory Code | Barcode | Call Number | Location | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
2207001464 | T71257 | T712572022 | Central Library (Reference) | Available but not for loan - Not for Loan |
No other version available